Since you asked: What information is available about COVID-19 and vaccinations in prison now?
Despite the new variants of COVID-19, prison systems are failing to publish up-to-date and necessary data and we don’t know much about booster shot access.
by Emily Widra, December 16, 2021
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, prison systems throughout the country began publishing COVID-19 data, lifting a tiny corner of the veil of secrecy that usually shields prisons from public scrutiny. These “COVID data dashboards” — which varied from state to state, but generally at least tracked the number of active cases, testing efforts, and COVID-19 deaths — marked a departure from the outdated, obscure data we usually see coming out of prison systems and state and federal agencies. However, the quality and comprehensiveness of the published data varied from state to state, and dashboards were often riddled with inadequacies and confusion. To make matters worse, even as the Delta variant surged through the country in the summer of 2021, the UCLA Law COVID-19 Behind Bars Data Project reported that a number of states — including those with some of the highest case rates, like Florida and Georgia — had rolled back their publicly available prison data.
Now that we’re facing yet another COVID-19 threat with the Omicron variant, many of these states have reinitiated data reporting on the number of COVID-19 cases and tests behind bars. And yet, data on COVID-19 vaccinations and booster doses — our strongest protection in the face of COVID-19 — are scarce and incomplete across the nation’s prison systems. Publicly available and regularly updated COVID-19 prison data — including vaccination and booster data — are crucial for holding public officials, politicians, and legislatures accountable, as well as for helping families and the general public obtain even the simplest information about COVID-19 in their loved ones’ facilities and local communities.
Most state prison systems provide patchy COVID-19 data, at best
In July 2021, the UCLA Law COVID-19 Behind Bars Data Project reported a startling trend: Many state correctional agencies were failing to regularly update their COVID-19 data, including lags of 58 days in Florida, 40 days in New Jersey, and more than two weeks in Wyoming, New Hampshire, Utah, Mississippi, Alaska, and Montana. Massachusetts and Rhode Island announced that they would no longer be updating their COVID-19 prison data dashboards. A month later, in August 2021, UCLA found that Florida and Georgia had completely removed their COVID-19 data dashboards, while Louisiana drastically reduced its published data to only include active case counts.1
In fact, patchy and delayed prison COVID-19 data has become the norm, not the exception. As of December 14, 2021, 8 state correctional agencies have COVID-19 data dashboards that have not been updated in the last week. The DOC COVID-19 dashboard in Montana has not been updated for 88 days so far, and it’s been 25 days in Mississippi, 14 days in Tennessee, 12 days in North Carolina, 11 days in Alabama and New York, 9 days in Alaska, and 8 days in Oregon. An additional four states’ DOC COVID-19 dashboards — Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, and Oklahoma — appear to be updated frequently but have no consistent information about when they last updated the data, leaving us unsure of how accurate and relevant the data are. West Virginia updates most of their COVID-19 data regularly, but their vaccination data are from November 5th, 2021, 39 days ago.
Even when they do update their dashboards, most states fail to report crucial information.
There are five major metrics that states should be tracking and publishing:
- cumulative case counts,
- active or current cases,
- cumulative deaths,
- vaccination progress, and
- testing counts.
Yet only three states provide sufficient data on all five of these metrics, for both incarcerated people and correctional staff: Washington, West Virginia, and Maryland. All other states with COVID-19 data dashboards are only publishing some of this data.
In particular, data on vaccine administration — and booster doses — are rare. Only 22 states and the federal system provide vaccination data for incarcerated people and only 15 states and federal prisons provide vaccination data for staff. Only two states — Maryland and South Carolina — are publishing the number of incarcerated people who have refused the vaccine, while no prison systems are publishing the number of staff who have refused a vaccine.2
What COVID-19 data does each state correctional agency and the Bureau of Prisons regularly publish?
Prison system | Incarcerated population | Correctional staff | Date of data | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In DOC dashboard? | Percent vaccinated | Source | In DOC dashboard? | Percent vaccinated | Source | |||||
Alabama | Yes | 66%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 23%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Alaska | Yes | 65% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
Arizona | No | No | ||||||||
Arkansas | No | No | ||||||||
California | Yes | 79% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 67% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Colorado | Yes | 87%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 82%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Connecticut | Yes | 54%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 54%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Delaware | Yes | 46% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
Federal | Yes | 77% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 67% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Florida | No data dashboard | No data dashboard | ||||||||
Georgia | No data dashboard | 59%* | The Marshall Project | No data dashboard | 24% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/22/21 Staff: 6/22/21 |
|||
Hawaii | No | 31% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 5/11/21 | |||||
Idaho | Yes | 79% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 6/22/21 | |||||
Illinois | No | 69% | The Marshall Project | No | 39% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/16/21 Staff: 3/14/21 |
|||
Indiana | No | 55% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/23/21 | |||||
Iowa | No | 65% | The Marshall Project | No | 56% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Kansas | Yes | 90%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 48%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 6/10/21 Staff: 5/13/21 |
|||
Kentucky | No | 79%* | The Marshall Project | No | 58% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/3/21 Staff: 6/3/21 |
|||
Louisiana | No | 58% | The Marshall Project | No | Reported 2,179 staff vaccinations to The Marshall Project, but did not report total number of staff. | Incarcerated: 6/23/21 Staff: 6/23/21 |
||||
Maine | Yes | 78% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
Maryland | Yes | 70% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 65% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 6/16/21 Staff: 6/16/21 |
|||
Massachusetts | No | 72% | The Marshall Project | No | 60% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/25/21 Staff: 6/16/21 |
|||
Michigan | No | 63% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/24/21 | |||||
Minnesota | Yes | 92% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 68% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 6/16/21 Staff: 6/16/21 |
|||
Mississippi | No | 58% | The Marshall Project | No | 32% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 6/16/21 |
|||
Missouri | Yes | 75%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 6/25/21 | |||||
Montana | No | 27% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/25/21 | |||||
Nebraska | No | No | ||||||||
Nevada | No data dashboard | 65%* | The Marshall Project | No data dashboard | 49%* | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/15/21 Staff: 6/15/21 |
|||
New Hampshire | Yes | 81% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 11/5/21 | |||||
New Jersey | New Jersey publishes the total number of doses administered to incarcerated people and staff, so it is unclear how many of those doses were initial doses or secondary doses. | |||||||||
New Mexico | No | 77% | The Marshall Project | No | 71% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/2/21 Staff: 6/23/21 |
|||
New York | No | 52% | The Marshall Project | No | 29% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
North Carolina | Yes | 73% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 52% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 6/8/21 Staff: 6/22/21 |
|||
North Dakota | No | 75% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/3/21 | |||||
Ohio | No | 57%* | The Marshall Project | No | 53%* | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 6/3/21 Staff: 5/2/21 |
|||
Oklahoma | No | No | Incarcerated: 6/9/21 | |||||||
Oregon | No | 77% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
Pennsylvania | Yes | 89% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 47% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 5/30/21 |
|||
Rhode Island | No | 59% | The Marshall Project | No | 65% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 4/16/21 Staff: 6/4/21 |
|||
South Carolina | Yes | 59% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
South Dakota | No | 67%* | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/21/21 | |||||
Tennessee | Tennessee publishes the total number of doses administered to incarcerated people and staff, so it is unclear how many of those doses were initial doses or secondary doses. | |||||||||
Texas | No | 42% | The Marshall Project | No | 35% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 6/22/21 |
|||
Utah | No | 7% | The Marshall Project | No | Incarcerated: 6/21/21 | |||||
Vermont | No | 65% | The Marshall Project | No | 47% | The Marshall Project | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Virginia | Yes | 69% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 47% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Washington | Yes | 73%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 48%* | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
West Virginia | Yes | 53% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Yes | 44% | UCLA/Data dashboard | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 Staff: 12/5/21 |
|||
Wisconsin | Yes | 81% | UCLA/Data dashboard | No | Incarcerated: 12/5/21 | |||||
Wyoming | No data dashboard | No data dashboard |
Only a few state prison systems are publishing data on booster shots
The CDC has made clear to the public that booster shots are crucial to maintaining protection from COVID-19 — particularly from newer variants like Delta and Omicron. But are prison systems following the booster dose recommendations of the federal government and the CDC? It’s hard to know, given the absolute scarcity of information about booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered in prisons across the country. Our survey of websites operated by state departments of corrections and the Bureau of Prisons found that only four states — Delaware, Missouri, Michigan, and Minnesota — are publishing data on booster dose administration for incarcerated people, while only one prison system — Maryland — is making data available about correctional staff booster doses.
Given the scarcity of COVID-19 vaccination data, it is concerning but perhaps not surprising that we struggled to find data on booster doses administered. Even more troubling, we were only able to find four state prison systems — North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Utah — that published explicit start dates for the administration of booster doses on their websites.3 An additional six prison systems — Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Idaho, Utah, Wisconsin, and the BOP — have put out policies or public statements that at least mentioned COVID-19 booster doses. This leaves us with no evidence that more than 40 other states are providing boosters at all. And when it comes to staff, we found no explicit plans for administering booster doses to prison staff in any prison system.
The COVID-19 pandemic is not over, either inside or outside prison walls. COVID-19 cases have spiked nationwide this fall (and are expected to again this winter), and many of the people most vulnerable to the virus are currently locked up. What’s more, we know that COVID-19 outbreaks in prisons can quickly spread to surrounding communities, with grave public health consequences. But alarmingly, it appears that state prison systems are not offering the booster shot to incarcerated people to protect them — as well as the general public — from COVID-19.
Finally, by retiring their COVID-19 data dashboards, prison systems are leaving the public in the dark about a critical public health measure. Rather than waiting until the pandemic is over to hold these prison systems accountable for their healthcare policy failures, we should demand transparency — and booster shots for incarcerated people — now.
If you know of notable policies or data about booster doses that should be included here, please let us know at virusresponse@prisonpolicy.org.
Footnotes
-
In a confounding move, weeks after restricting their published data, the Louisiana Department of Corrections announced on July 27 that it was suspending visitation due to the “latest surge of COVID-19 positive cases in Louisiana,” as reported by UCLA. If the drastic statewide surge in cases was enough to shut down visitation, we would expect the Department to increase — not diminish — data transparency. ↩
-
This does not mean that these data are not published elsewhere. The survey we conducted for this update was based solely on the COVID-19 data dashboards on the individual state department of corrections websites. For example, news sources have published correctional staff vaccine refusal data at a single point in time for Massachusetts and Minnesota. ↩
-
A news source reported that a fifth state prison system, North Carolina, has begun administering booster doses, but we were not able to find this information on the North Carolina Department of Public Safety website. ↩
The federal burue of prisons is inept and very sly. Danbury CT. The inmates have had no visits since before Thanksgiving they are on red notice half the staff isn’t coming in and the other half does not care. If anything goes wrong I wouldn’t be surprised if they claim the inmates were trying to escape. There is no information on any of the variants in the bop web.