The Geography of Punishment:
How Huge Sentencing Enhancement Zones
Harm Communities, Fail to Protect Children
by Aleks Kajstura , Peter Wagner , and William Goldberg
Prison Policy Initiative
July 2008Section: Press release Executive Summary Introduction Deterrence, Theory and Practice Failing to protect children, harming communities An 'urban effect' Recommendations Methodology Acknowledgments About the authors 1,000 feet is further than you think (sidebar) Vermont's unique sentencing enhancement zone statute (sidebar) County demographics (Appendix A) Drug charges in Hampden County courts and in Massachusetts (Appendix B) Demographic analysis of cities and towns in Hampden County (Appendix C) Rural/Urban percentages of Hampden County cities and towns (Appendix D) Demographic analysis of populations living in enhancement zones (Appendix E) Demographic analysis of the populations living in zones, by House district (Appendix F) Demographic analysis of populations in 100-foot enhancement zones (Appendix G) Full page interactive map of Hampden County zones and population Drug-Free Zones Facing Review (Springfield Republican)
Appendix B. Drug charges in Hampden County courts and in Massachusetts
Appendix B. Drug charges in Hampden County courts and in Massachusetts
Court Jurisdiction Narcotics charges, 2005 Population, 2000 Drug charges per 1,000 people
Chicopee Chicopee 444 54,653 8.1
Holyoke Holyoke 1,536 39,838 38.6
Palmer Ludlow, Wilbraham, Hampden, East Longmeadow, Palmer, Monson, Brimfield, Wales, Holland 349 120,627 2.9
Springfield Springfield, West Springfield, Longmeadow 3,617 195,614 18.5
Westfield Chester, Blandford,Tolland, Granville, Russell, Montgomery, Westfield, Southwick, Agawam 307 45,496 6.7
Hampden County 6,253 456,228 13.7
Massachusetts 44,163 6,349,097 7