The Geography of Punishment:
How Huge Sentencing Enhancement Zones
Harm Communities, Fail to Protect Children
by Aleks Kajstura , Peter Wagner , and William Goldberg
Prison Policy Initiative
July 2008Section: Press release Executive Summary Introduction Deterrence, Theory and Practice Failing to protect children, harming communities An 'urban effect' Recommendations Methodology Acknowledgments About the authors 1,000 feet is further than you think (sidebar) Vermont's unique sentencing enhancement zone statute (sidebar) County demographics (Appendix A) Drug charges in Hampden County courts and in Massachusetts (Appendix B) Demographic analysis of cities and towns in Hampden County (Appendix C) Rural/Urban percentages of Hampden County cities and towns (Appendix D) Demographic analysis of populations living in enhancement zones (Appendix E) Demographic analysis of the populations living in zones, by House district (Appendix F) Demographic analysis of populations in 100-foot enhancement zones (Appendix G) Full page interactive map of Hampden County zones and population Drug-Free Zones Facing Review (Springfield Republican)
Appendix F. Demographic analysis of the populations living in enhancement
zones, by House district.
Appendix F. Demographic analysis of the populations living in enhancement
zones, by House district.
District demographics in Hampden County Populations in the zones
Percent of population living in a zone
Population White Black Latino Total White Black Latino Total White Black Latino
1st Hampden 19,980 19,274 154 242 3,134 3,017 28 31 15.7% 15.7% 18.1% 12.7%
2nd Hampden 41,286 38,629 664 979 9,871 8,797 303 428 23.9% 22.8% 45.6% 43.7%
3rd Hampden 40,157 38,468 370 701 7,873 7,552 62 141 19.6% 19.6% 16.9% 20.1%
4th Hampden 40,072 36,893 427 2,008 11,697 10,452 134 867 29.2% 28.3% 31.3% 43.2%
5th Hampden 39,838 21,508 1,187 16,485 23,322 9,730 742 12,475 58.5% 45.2% 62.5% 75.7%
6th Hampden 40,846 35,884 969 2,763 13,356 11,702 315 898 32.7% 32.6% 32.5% 32.5%
7th Hampden 29,849 27,198 1,064 1,162 7,061 6,210 254 401 23.7% 22.8% 23.8% 34.5%
8th Hampden 38,016 32,204 1,026 3,987 13,007 10,437 493 1,812 34.2% 32.4% 48.0% 45.5%
9th Hampden 40,859 26,709 5,298 7,927 13,846 9,137 1,514 2,838 33.9% 34.2% 28.6% 35.8%
10th Hampden 37,732 11,108 5,379 19,799 23,148 6,586 3,402 12,257 61.3% 59.3% 63.2% 61.9%
11th Hampden 40,461 11,684 17,675 10,121 25,138 6,223 11,068 7,256 62.1% 53.3% 62.6% 71.7%
12th Hampden 41,642 36,492 2,234 1,882 10,642 9,094 604 609 25.6% 24.9% 27.0% 32.3%
1st Hampshire 654 639 0 5 0 0 0 0 0% 0% n/a 0%
4th Berkshire 2,948 2,887 16 26 226 220 2 1 7.6% 7.6% 11.3% 3.1%
Hampden County 454,340 339,577 36,463 68,087 162,321 99,155 18,919 40,011 35.7% 29.2% 51.9% 58.8%
District descriptions
1st Hampden: Palmer, Brimfield, Wales, Holland and parts of Worcester and Hampshire counties.
2nd Hampden: Monson, Hampden, Longmeadow, and parts of East Longmeadow and Springfield.
3rd Hampden: Russell, Granville, Southwick and Agawam.
4th Hampden: Westfield.
5th Hampden: Holyoke.
6th Hampden: West Springfield, parts of Chicopee and Springfield.
7th Hampden: Ludlow, parts of Chicopee and Springfield and Hampshire County.
8th Hampden: Parts of Chicopee.
9th Hampden: Parts of Chicopee and Springfield.
10th Hampden: Parts of Springfield.
11th Hampden: Parts of Springfield.
12th Hampden: Parts of East Longmeadow and Springfield.
1st Hampshire: Montgomery and parts of Hampshire County not included in this analysis.
4th Berkshire: Blandford, Chester, Tolland and parts of Berkshire County not included in this analysis.